I do not understand why some elements
are torturous for some and a source of pure energy and excitement for
others. Especially those that are unpredictable and outrageously
burdensome. Perhaps I can understand, somewhat, as I know people who
think writing, for any reason, is outrageously burdensome, while it
gives me a source of excitement.
If anyone has ever read, heard, or
listened to The Phantom of the Opera,
he or she is most likely to wonder what happened to Christine Daae at
the end of the adventure in the Paris Opera house.
Because I love
Sarah Brightman's voice, Andrew Lloyd Webber's music, and even the
movie version of Miss Daae, I decided I should read the book. And I
did. What was strange, however, was that while I looked at it from a
Christian worldview the entire time, I was on Raoul's side only the
first three quarters of Leroux's novel. Another book, however, helped me discover the truth and message of the real Phantom.
The
last quarter I was won over by the Phantom. Even though I did not
want to be. Leroux even blatantly stated “...why is it that we
all cheer on the
Phantom...?” (My quoting is not exact, but pretty close: I'll find
citing later).
So I actually
thought about it for three days. And nights. Okay, I did get sleep,
but I was really wondering why I had, for the majority of the book,
rooted for the decent fellow, only to switch my loyalty to the dark
mystery.
When I
finished The Phantom of the Opera to
the last triumphant chords of “Destiny” on the Prince
of Persia soundtrack, I
wondered: What had swayed my mind from Raoul's side to that of the
Phantom?
Thanks to C. S. Lewis, all my problems involving the Opera Ghost dissolved. When about twenty minutes of light remained in the sky, I ran outside and swung while finishing Chapter Two of Lewis' The Four Loves. Reading jovially, I was caught unawares by a passage I did not understand at first. (Lewis' book includes six chapters; an introduction, and a chapter on each of the following; Likings and Loves for the Sub-Human, On Affection, On Friendship, On Eros, and On Charity).
The
end of the second chapter read:
[affection]...can
also be felt for bodies that claim more than a natural
affection...Here it will be enough to say that Heavenly Society is
also an earthly society. Our (merely natural) patriotism towards
the latter can very easily borrow the transcendent claims of the
former and then use then to justify the most abominable means (Lewis,
49).
I
realized that the only reason I had turned from Raoul's side to that
of O.G. was because of my sinful love for man; loving your
fellow man is not wrong, but when it is loved to the extent of
twisting what is right, it is not. Love merely for the fallen man is
sin nature, and is natural, it just must be beaten down.
So.
The Phantom. Bad or not? The fact that he was disfigured did not
make him bad, nor did his surroundings or environment stamp evil upon
him. He chose to do what he wished.
But
then how could he love? The fact that he died from a broken heart –
does that not mean he had feelings, love, life?
Yes.
But...he
was still wrong. That one love, nay, obsession
over his own love for Christine and her voice does not, and will never, erase all the wrongs he did before. This is Eros love. “It's all
for love, it must be right.”
No.
That's
what's wrong with The Notebook, The Phantom, The Iliad,
Anna Karenina, Tristan and Isolde, and many, many
other “great works”. It's all for love. So it's okay. No one
else matters except us. It would be better to die together than
spend the rest of our lives apart. We love.
Eros is not the ultimate evil except when it becomes a total god, as in the aforementioned works.
Eros is not the ultimate evil except when it becomes a total god, as in the aforementioned works.
Eros
is scary. It makes you change your mind. The Phantom may not seem
that bad until you notice that his name is Erik (which is a little
too close to Eros). Loving someone does not erase bad deeds (or
worse, what could be about to be done). Unless that someone is God, and
you love his grace that washes sin away, love can't erase evil.
Only God's love can cover a multitude of sins.
Christine
should have quit, run away, started a new life, and married the Persian.
THE PERSIAN!!! XD But did she love him? Does the heart ever follow should'ves?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete